A recent study published in Scientific Reports examines the understanding of resistance training (RT) myths and truths among gym-goers in Austria. Despite the growing popularity of RT and its well-documented health benefits, the study reveals a significant gap between scientific evidence and public perception.
Study Overview
Researchers surveyed 721 individuals (average age: 30.1 years; 63% male) from various fitness centres across Austria. Participants completed a digital questionnaire comprising 14 statements related to RT practices, each classified as either a myth or a truth based on findings from 45 systematic reviews. The aim was to assess the participants' ability to correctly identify evidence-based information.
Key Findings
Only five out of the 14 statements were correctly identified by a majority of participants. These included:
-
Truths:
-
Protein supplementation enhances strength and hypertrophy.
-
Creatine supplementation increases strength.
-
Full-range-of-motion RT is superior to partial-range-of-motion RT for muscle growth.
-
-
Myths:
-
RT reduces flexibility.
-
Low-load, high-volume RT is as effective as high-load RT for maximal strength gains.
-
The remaining nine statements did not achieve a majority of correct responses, indicating widespread misconceptions about RT among gym-goers.
Conclusion
The study highlights a considerable disconnect between scientific research and the beliefs held by individuals engaging in RT. This underscores the need for improved science communication strategies to bridge the knowledge gap and promote evidence-based practices in fitness settings.
